III · THE WORK · ART HISTORY

The Last Judgment

Michelangelo · 1536–1541 · Fresco · Sistine Chapel

▶ Listen · narrated

Michelangelo returned to the Sistine Chapel a quarter-century after the ceiling and filled the altar wall with the dead rising and the damned descending.

At a glance

Artist: Michelangelo
Date: 1536–1541
Medium: Fresco
Dimensions: 1370 × 1220 cm (40 ft)
Location: Sistine Chapel, Vatican City
Genre: Religious art

Look closer

Left saved, right damned
In the lower half of the wall Michelangelo keeps to a long-standing arrangement: the saved rise on the left, the damned sink on the right. The division is not neat. Bodies twist across the centre, and the space between ascent and fall is crowded with figures still undecided in motion. The eye is pulled sideways as much as up.
Nudes and later draperies
Nearly all the males and the angels were first painted nude. Painted draperies were added later to cover many of them; after cleaning and restoration, some of those coverings remain. The wall therefore carries two decisions at once — the original bodies and the later wish to clothe them — both still visible in the same surface.
Flesh, sky, and scattered colour
Compared with the ceiling frescoes above, the wall reads as more monochromatic, built from the tones of flesh and sky. Cleaning and restoration brought out a wider range than soot had allowed: orange, green, yellow and blue appear in small passages across the composition, tying the dense crowd of figures together without breaking the dominant skin-and-air palette.

The story

The Last Judgment covers the whole altar wall of the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City. It is a fresco of the Second Coming of Christ and the final judgment of humanity. The dead rise from their graves and move toward their eternal fates; Christ stands at the centre, surrounded by prominent saints. Altogether there are over three hundred figures.

Michelangelo began the work twenty-five years after he finished the chapel ceiling. Preparation of the altar wall started in 1535; painting ran from 1536 to 1541 and took more than four years. He was nearly sixty-seven when it was done. The commission had first been accepted under Pope Clement VII and was completed under Pope Paul III, whose stronger reforming views probably shaped the final treatment.

The composition follows tradition in its broad layout. In the lower zone the saved ascend on the left and the damned descend on the right. Above, the inhabitants of Heaven are joined by the newly saved. The wall is dominated by flesh tones and sky, more restrained in colour than the ceiling, though restoration has shown that orange, green, yellow and blue run through the scene and help hold its complexity together.

Almost all the male figures and the angels were originally nude. Many were later partly covered by painted draperies. Some of those draperies are still there after recent cleaning and restoration, so the wall preserves both the first design and the later impulse to moderate it.

The fresco belongs to the Italian Renaissance and is also linked with Mannerism. Its muscular bodies and crowded arrangement were noticed at once. Reception was mixed from the start: there was praise, and there was criticism on both religious and artistic grounds. The quantity of nudity, the physical style of the figures, and the overall composition were all points of contention. The painting remains in the Sistine Chapel as part of the Vatican Museums.

Why it mattered then

The wall was painted in the middle of the sixteenth century, under a papacy already marked by reform. Michelangelo had accepted the subject from Clement VII; Paul III saw it through, and his stricter climate of reform is thought to have affected how the judgment was finally treated. A fresco of the Second Coming on the altar wall of the pope’s own chapel was not a private devotional image. It faced the congregation and the papal court at the liturgical centre of the room. The choice to fill that wall with more than three hundred largely nude, heavily muscled bodies made the work immediately contentious. Praise and objection arrived together. Critics attacked the nudity and the physical style on religious grounds, and they also argued about the composition as art. The later campaign of painted draperies is itself evidence of how unsettled the reception was: the wall was altered after completion because parts of its first state were judged unacceptable. In its own moment, then, The Last Judgment was both an official statement of doctrine and a public argument about what sacred painting was allowed to show.

Why it matters now

The fresco is still on the wall for which it was made, still read against the ceiling Michelangelo had finished a generation earlier. That continuity matters. Viewers can still measure the shift in colour, density and tone between the two campaigns, and can still see where later draperies interrupt the original nudes. The cleaning and restoration that recovered orange, green, yellow and blue also recovered a more complicated surface than the darkened wall had suggested for centuries. The old disputes have not wholly gone away. Questions about the muscular bodies, the amount of flesh, and the crowded composition remain part of how the work is discussed. So does the fact that the painting was changed after it was finished. Looking at The Last Judgment now means looking at a surface that records more than one decision: Michelangelo’s first design, the reforming pressures of its completion, and the later coverings that still partly remain. It is a document of belief and of discomfort with that belief’s visual form.

The surprising detail

Nearly every male figure and angel was first shown nude. The painted draperies that later covered many of them were not part of Michelangelo’s original design; they were additions, and after cleaning and restoration some of those additions are still present on the wall. The fresco therefore displays, side by side, the bodies as first painted and the later wish to hide them. The argument about the nudes did not only happen in writing — it was painted onto the work itself.

What is disputed

How far Pope Paul III’s reforming views shaped the final treatment is stated as probable rather than proven. The mixed early reception is clear in outline — praise alongside religious and artistic criticism — but the precise weight of each objection is not settled in the sources used here. Some later draperies remain after restoration; not every covering was removed, and the wall still mixes original and altered passages.

Remember this

The altar wall holds both Michelangelo’s original nudes and the later draperies that partly covered them — a judgment scene that still carries the dispute about its own bodies.

Test yourself

Why does the survival of later painted draperies on The Last Judgment change how we read the fresco as a historical object, not only as a composition?

Go deeper

Image: Burkhard Mücke, CC BY-SA 4.0. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0. Source.

← Back to day 112