I · THE OBJECT · BRITISH MUSEUM
Pediments of the Parthenon
▶ Listen · narrated
These sculptures preserve only part of a larger arrangement, yet their broken survivals still shape how the Parthenon is encountered, studied and argued over.
At a glance
- Date
- 440 BC
- Material
- Marble
- Creator
- Phidias
- Collection
- British Museum
Look closer
A group, not one figure
The title refers to two sets of sculpture rather than a single object. They originally occupied the east and west façades of the Parthenon. What remains is therefore best understood as part of an arrangement: figures, spaces between them, and the larger architectural setting all mattered.
Marble and loss
The sculptures are marble, but their present condition is inseparable from damage, weathering and removal. Some surviving works are figures; others are fragments. Their breaks do not simply mark absence. They make visible the long, difficult history of an ensemble that was altered and dispersed over time.
Two stories
The ancient writer Pausanias described different subjects for the two pediments: Athena’s birth on the east and her contest with Poseidon for Athens on the west. The pairing gave each façade a distinct narrative, while keeping Athena at the centre of the whole sculptural programme.
The story
The Pediments of the Parthenon are a sculptural ensemble in marble, made in 440 BC and attributed here to Phidias. Their name can sound technical, but it describes something direct: two groups of statues made for the two façades of the Parthenon on the Acropolis of Athens.
Pausanias recorded the subjects. The eastern group showed the birth of Athena. The western group showed Athena and Poseidon contending to become Athens’ tutelary deity. These were not isolated scenes placed in a gallery for close, unhurried inspection. They belonged to a building and worked as parts of its outward face.
That original unity is no longer available. The pediments have undergone repeated damage through natural disasters, fire, religious conflict, weathering and pollution. Since the temple remained in use for almost a thousand years, repairs, alterations and replacements may also have occurred. The surviving sculptures and fragments ask the viewer to reckon with both the ancient design and its later history.
The British Museum holds works from the pediments, while other statues and many fragments are in the Acropolis Museum. This divided condition is central to their meaning now. No single display can entirely restore the relation between the two façades, the missing figures and the Parthenon itself. What survives nonetheless retains the force of a deliberately organised public image: marble bodies and narratives made to be read across a monumental building.
Why it mattered then
In their original setting, the two pediments probably gave the Parthenon complementary accounts of Athena. One concerned her birth; the other her claim to Athens against Poseidon. Together, they placed the city’s tutelary deity at the centre of the building’s outward sculptural language. The scale of the undertaking also mattered. Around fifty statues were originally involved, and the works were probably made by several artists, with Phidias as master builder. Their placement on the east and west façades made the narratives part of the Parthenon’s public presence rather than separate images.
Why it matters now
The pediments matter now partly because they are no longer whole or gathered in one place. Works from the ensemble are held by the British Museum, while other statues and many fragments remain in the Acropolis Museum. Viewing them involves an act of reconstruction: connecting surviving marble to damaged figures, absent companions and an architectural setting in Athens. They also matter because their removal remains part of a continuing debate about the Parthenon sculptures. That debate is not separate from looking. It asks what it means to encounter a fragment as a museum object when it once belonged to a larger building, narrative and civic setting.
The surprising detail
The pediments’ present form is not simply the result of one destructive event. The reference account describes repeated damage from natural disasters, fire, religious conflicts, weathering and pollution. It also notes that the Parthenon was in use for almost a thousand years, making later repair, modification or replacement of some figures a reasonable possibility rather than a detail that can always be securely identified.
What is disputed
The reference account says the pediments were probably made by several artists and that Phidias was probably the master builder. It also says they were probably raised into position by 432 BC. The extent of later repair, modification or replacement cannot be securely reconstructed for every figure.
How it got here
The reference account states that several statues were removed from the Parthenon by Lord Elgin’s agents in the early nineteenth century and transported to the British Museum. Other statues and many fragments are held by the Acropolis Museum. Their separation remains relevant to discussions of the Parthenon sculptures and their future location.
Remember this
These are not separate statues by accident: they are surviving parts of two marble narratives made for the Parthenon’s façades.
Test yourself
Why is it limiting to treat a surviving pediment figure as though it were an independent statue?
Because each figure originally belonged to one of two larger sculptural arrangements on the Parthenon. Its meaning depended on neighbouring figures, a specific narrative and its position on a façade. The fragment can still be studied closely, but its original purpose becomes clearer when it is considered as part of that lost ensemble.
Go deeper
Image: Ad Meskens You are free to use this picture for any purpose as long as you credit its author, Ad Meskens . Example: © Ad Meskens / Wikimedia Commons If you use this work outside of the Wikimedia projects, a message or a copy is very much appreciated. This image is not in the public domain. A statement such as "From Wikimedia Commons" or similar is not by itself sufficient. If you do not provide clear attribution to the author you do not comply with the terms of the file's license and you may not use this file. If you are unable or unwilling to provide attribution you should contact Ad Meskens to negotiate a different license., CC BY-SA 4.0. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0. Source.