Skip to content
The Daily Triptych021 / 365
A woman with long dark hair and a transparent veil, hands folded, seated before a distant landscape of rocks and water. Her expression is calm, her gaze direct, and the corners of her mouth dissolve into shadow.

3 details · select a number

Leonardo da Vinci, Public domain
Public domain

III · THE WORK · ART HISTORY

Leonardo's Mona Lisa

Leonardo da Vinci · 1503–1517 · Oil on poplar panel · Louvre Museum

▶ Listen · narrated

The painting that is now the most recognised image in Western art was, until 1911, simply one portrait among many in the Louvre's vast collection.

At a glance

Artist
Leonardo da Vinci
Date
Begun 1503, possibly worked on until 1517
Medium
Oil paint on poplar panel
Dimensions
79.4 × 53.4 cm (1 ft 9 in)
Location
Salle des États, Louvre Museum

Look closer

  1. The mouth that will not resolve

    The corners of the lips dissolve into shadow without a defining line. This is sfumato carried to its limit: Leonardo built up oil glazes so thin and so numerous that the transition from lit flesh to shadow happens across a zone too subtle for the eye to parse as a boundary. The result is that the expression refuses to hold still. Look at the mouth directly and it seems neutral; look at the eyes and let the mouth sit in peripheral vision and it appears to shift.

  2. A landscape with two horizons

    The rocky valley behind the figure's left shoulder sits visibly lower than the plain behind her right. If you extended both sides to meet behind her head, they would not align. Whether this is intentional or the result of the panel warping over five centuries is disputed, but the effect is that the figure appears stable while the world around her does not. The misalignment is not subtle once noticed.

  3. The veil that should not be transparent

    A fine black veil lies over the sitter's hair, rendered so that individual strands of hair remain visible beneath it. The technical difficulty is considerable: to paint translucency in oil requires control of tonal intervals across multiple overlapping layers. The veil reads as fabric, as depth, and as evidence of the sitter's status — married women in early sixteenth-century Florence wore such veils — without ever becoming opaque or losing the hair beneath it.

The story

Leonardo began this portrait in 1503, and there is evidence he was still adjusting it fourteen years later. The sitter is widely believed to be Lisa Gherardini, wife of a Florentine silk merchant named Francesco del Giocondo, though Leonardo himself left no written confirmation and never delivered the painting to the family who commissioned it. He carried it with him when he moved to France in 1516, and it remained in his possession until his death in 1519. King Francis I acquired it afterward, and it entered the French royal collection.

The technique is sfumato, a method Leonardo refined over decades. He applied oil paint in glazes thin enough to be translucent, building up tone and colour through accumulated layers rather than through single opaque strokes. The result is that no individual brushstroke is visible on the surface. Light penetrates the glaze layers, reflects off the white poplar panel beneath, and returns through them, creating a softness that has no hard edges. The shadows around the eyes, the temples, the sides of the nose, and especially the corners of the mouth are not painted as lines but as gradients that the eye cannot fix into a boundary.

The landscape behind the figure is not a real place. It is an invented terrain of rocky outcrops, winding paths, a bridge, and distant water, rendered in blues and greens that fade into atmospheric haze. But the two sides do not match. The horizon line on the left is lower than the one on the right, so that the landscape appears tilted or split. Whether Leonardo intended this, or whether the panel warped after he painted it, remains unresolved. The effect, intended or not, is that the figure is solid and frontal while the world she sits against is unstable.

The painting hung in the Louvre for more than a century without exceptional fame. It was admired by those who studied Leonardo, but it was not mobbed, and it was not widely reproduced. That changed in 1911. On 21 August, an Italian handyman named Vincenzo Peruggia removed the painting from the wall during the museum's closed day, hid it under his coat, and walked out. The theft was not discovered until the following day. The empty space on the wall became news across Europe and then across the world.

Peruggia kept the painting in his Paris lodgings for two years, then took it to Florence and attempted to sell it to the Uffizi Gallery. He was arrested in December 1913. He claimed he had stolen it out of patriotism, believing it should be returned to Italy. The trial was brief; he served seven months. The painting was exhibited in Florence, Rome and Milan before being returned to France in January 1914. By then, its fame had become structural. The theft had converted a painting into a news event, and the news event had made it the most recognised artwork in the world.

Since its return, the Mona Lisa has hung in the Louvre behind glass, and since 2005 behind climate-controlled bulletproof glass in the Salle des États. It has been lent out for exhibition only a handful of times. It has been valued, insured, sung about, parodied, and visited by millions annually. The painting that Leonardo never finished and never gave up has become the single image most people name when asked to name a painting.

Why it mattered then

Leonardo was not working for a public. He was working for himself. The portrait was commissioned by Francesco del Giocondo, but Leonardo did not deliver it. He kept it, carried it with him, and by some accounts continued to adjust it for years after the commission would have been considered complete. This was not unusual for him — he had a reputation for not finishing projects — but it suggests that the painting functioned as a site of ongoing technical investigation rather than as a completed transaction. The technique he used, sfumato, was his own refinement. Other painters used glazes, but Leonardo's were thinner and more numerous, and the transitions he achieved were softer than anything his contemporaries managed. The lack of visible brushwork was noticed in his lifetime. It was a demonstration of control, and it required oil paint, which dries slowly enough to allow the layering and blending that tempera does not. The effect was that the figure appeared to exist in air, not on a surface. That was the technical problem he was solving: how to make a painted face read as flesh seen through atmosphere, not as pigment laid on wood.

Why it matters now

The Mona Lisa is the most visited painting in the world, and it is seen under conditions that make close looking nearly impossible. It hangs behind thick glass, in a large room, surrounded by barriers and crowds. Most visitors photograph it from several metres away and move on. The painting that was made through obsessive attention to minute tonal transitions is now experienced primarily as an icon, a confirmation that you have been somewhere. This is not entirely the painting's fault, but it is its situation. The 1911 theft converted it from an artwork into a celebrity, and celebrity has a momentum that has nothing to do with the object that triggered it. The painting is now more famous for being famous than for anything Leonardo did to it. It appears on tea towels, in advertisements, in cartoons, and in social media posts, almost always as a shorthand for Art Itself rather than as a specific image worth looking at. Yet the painting still repays close attention when that attention is possible. The sfumato is still there, still doing what Leonardo intended. The landscape still does not align. The veil still lies transparently over the hair. The technical achievements have not diminished, even if the circumstances of viewing them have. The difficulty now is not understanding what Leonardo did, but finding a way to see it through the noise of its own fame.

The surprising detail

The theft that made the Mona Lisa globally famous also made a suspect of Pablo Picasso. In the days after the painting disappeared, French police investigated anyone known to have handled stolen art from the Louvre. Picasso's friend, the poet Guillaume Apollinaire, had previously bought two stolen Iberian stone heads from a thief named Géry Pieret, who had taken them from the museum. When the Mona Lisa vanished, police questioned Apollinaire, who panicked and named Picasso. Both were brought in for interrogation. Neither had anything to do with the painting's theft, and both were released, but for a brief period in September 1911, Picasso was a suspect in the most famous art theft in history. The actual thief, Vincenzo Peruggia, was not caught for more than two years.

What is disputed

The identification of the sitter as Lisa Gherardini is traditional and widely accepted, but Leonardo left no written record confirming it. The dates of work are also uncertain: the painting was likely begun in 1503, but evidence suggests Leonardo may have continued adjusting it as late as 1517. Whether the misaligned horizon lines in the landscape are intentional or the result of the panel warping over time is disputed and cannot be resolved from the visual evidence alone.

Remember this

The painting became the most famous artwork in the world not when Leonardo finished it, but when someone stole it in 1911.

Test yourself

Leonardo applied sfumato using glazes thin enough that no brushstroke is visible. What practical constraint of oil paint made this technique possible in a way that earlier tempera painting could not achieve?

Go deeper

Image: Leonardo da Vinci, Public domain. Licence: Public domain. Source.

← Back to day 21