Skip to content
The Daily Triptych023 / 365
A long sheet of papyrus covered in columns of hieratic script, written in black ink with section headings in red, showing mathematical problems and their worked solutions.
MinnesotanUser, CC BY-SA 4.0
CC BY-SA 4.0

I · THE OBJECT · BRITISH MUSEUM

The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus

Second Intermediate Period Egypt · c. 1550 BC · Papyrus

▶ Listen · narrated

Ancient mathematics survives not as theory but as worked examples: divide ten loaves among ten men, calculate the slope of a pyramid face, measure out beer rations fairly.

At a glance

Date
Copied in regnal year 33 of Awserre (c. 1550 BC)
Material
Papyrus
Scribe
Ahmes (also spelled Ahmose)
Collection
British Library (split with Brooklyn Museum)

Look closer

  1. A copy of a copy, with mistakes preserved

    Ahmes tells us in his opening that he is copying from an older text made in the reign of Nimaatre, a king who ruled roughly two centuries earlier. He is not inventing these problems; he is a copyist. And he makes errors. In some problems the arithmetic does not work out, or a step is omitted, or a method is applied inconsistently. These mistakes are useful: they show us that Ahmes did not fully understand everything he was copying, and that Egyptian mathematical knowledge was transmitted through worked examples rather than through general rules.

  2. The seked: measuring pyramid slope

    Several problems ask the scribe to calculate the seked of a pyramid, a measure of slope expressed as horizontal setback per cubit of rise. Problem 56 gives a pyramid 250 cubits high with a base 360 cubits square, and asks for the seked. The solution divides half the base by the height, then converts the result into palms. The answer comes out as five palms and one finger of setback per cubit upward. This is practical geometry for builders, not abstract theory.

  3. Unit fractions only

    Egyptian mathematics did not use fractions as we do. Apart from two-thirds, which had its own symbol, all fractions were written as sums of unit fractions: one part of something. Three-quarters became one-half plus one-quarter. Five-eighths became one-half plus one-eighth. The papyrus opens with a table converting fractions of the form two divided by odd numbers into sums of unit fractions, a reference the scribe would need constantly. This system makes some operations simple and others cumbersome, but it was the system they had.

The story

The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus is a working document. It contains eighty-four problems, each with a worked solution, copied out by a scribe named Ahmes in the thirty-third regnal year of a king called Awserre. That places the copy around 1550 BC, in the Second Intermediate Period, a time when Egypt was divided and the Hyksos kings controlled the north. Ahmes tells us he is copying from an older manuscript made during the reign of Nimaatre, roughly two centuries before his own time. He is preserving knowledge, not creating it.

The problems are practical. Divide a hundred loaves among ten men. Calculate how much grain is needed to make a given quantity of beer. Work out the area of a circular field. Find the slope of a pyramid face. Distribute rations proportionally. These are the problems a scribe in an administrative role would need to solve: accounting, surveying, construction, resource allocation. There is no abstract theory here, no proofs, no exploration of why a method works. Each problem states a question, shows the steps to the answer, and moves on.

Problem 79 is typical. It lists a household with seven people, forty-nine cats, three hundred and forty-three mice, two thousand four hundred and one ears of grain, and sixteen thousand eight hundred and seven measures of grain. The problem asks for the total. The solution simply adds them up. The numbers follow a geometric progression with a ratio of seven, but the papyrus does not say so. It treats this as an accounting exercise, not as an illustration of a pattern.

The seked problems are more revealing. The seked is a measure of slope, expressed as the horizontal distance you move inward for every cubit you rise. Problem 56 gives a pyramid with a height of 250 cubits and a square base 360 cubits on each side. The solution takes half the base, 180 cubits, and divides it by the height. That gives a ratio, which is then converted into palms, the smaller unit. The answer is five palms and one finger per cubit of rise. This is a real calculation for pyramid construction, where maintaining a consistent slope was essential.

Ahmes makes mistakes. In some problems the arithmetic does not balance. In others a step is skipped or a method is applied inconsistently. These errors are informative. They show that Ahmes did not always understand the material he was copying, and that Egyptian mathematics was learned by example rather than by general principles. A scribe would memorise procedures for standard problems and adapt them as needed. When the problem changed in an unfamiliar way, the method might fail.

The papyrus also contains a long table at the beginning, converting fractions of the form two divided by an odd number into sums of unit fractions. Two divided by five becomes one-third plus one-fifteenth. Two divided by seven becomes one-quarter plus one-twenty-eighth. This table was essential because Egyptian mathematics used almost exclusively unit fractions: one-half, one-third, one-tenth, but not two-fifths or three-sevenths. The only exception was two-thirds, which had its own hieratic sign. Every other fraction had to be broken down into unit parts, and the table provided standard conversions the scribe could refer to.

This system makes some operations straightforward and others laborious. Adding one-half and one-quarter is simple. Multiplying fractions or dividing them becomes a series of expansions and recombinations. Modern readers sometimes assume the Egyptians must have had a more efficient method they kept hidden, but the papyrus shows no sign of it. The unit fraction system is what they used, and Ahmes works within it throughout.

Why it mattered then

The papyrus mattered because scribes needed to calculate, and calculation required reference. Ahmes was not writing for other mathematicians. He was copying out a training manual or a reference text for administrative work: the problems a scribe in a temple, a granary, or a building project would actually face. The fact that he was copying from a text two centuries old suggests these problems were standard, part of a scribal curriculum that had been stable for generations. The Second Intermediate Period was a time of political fragmentation. The Hyksos controlled the Delta, Theban kings ruled the south, and Nubian kingdoms pressed from below. In such a period, maintaining administrative continuity mattered. A scribe who could measure fields, calculate rations, and manage construction kept the machinery of the state running. The papyrus is evidence of that continuity: knowledge preserved and transmitted even when political structures fractured.

Why it matters now

The Rhind Papyrus matters now because it shows us what ancient mathematics actually was, not what we wish it had been. There is a recurring temptation to claim the Egyptians knew more than the texts demonstrate: that they understood pi to great precision, that they had proto-algebra, that they anticipated later discoveries. The papyrus resists that. It shows practical methods, applied to practical problems, with no sign of generalisation or proof. That does not make it less impressive. The methods work. The seked problems produce correct slopes. The area calculations are accurate within the limits of the system. And the unit fraction table, cumbersome as it seems, was a functioning tool for centuries. The papyrus is a reminder that mathematics does not have to be theoretical to be effective, and that a culture can solve complex problems without the framework we now consider essential.

The surprising detail

The back of the papyrus contains a note that has nothing to do with mathematics. It records that in regnal year eleven, second month of Shemu, Heliopolis was entered, and on the twenty-third day of the first month of Akhet, someone called 'he of the South' broke into Tjaru. Egyptologists now agree that 'he of the South' refers to Ahmose I, the Theban king who expelled the Hyksos and reunified Egypt. The note places the fall of the Hyksos capital within a few years of the papyrus being copied. Ahmes was working in a kingdom on the edge of transformation, copying out old problems while the political order around him collapsed and reformed.

What is disputed

The identity of the king Awserre, in whose reign Ahmes made the copy, is uncertain. He is usually identified with Apophis, a Hyksos ruler, but the identification is not secure. The earlier king Nimaatre is thought to be Amenemhat III of the Twelfth Dynasty, but again this is based on partial evidence. The historical note on the verso identifying 'he of the South' with Ahmose I is now widely accepted among Egyptologists, but it depends on interpreting a fragmentary and allusive text.

How it got here

The papyrus was purchased in 1858 by the Scottish antiquarian Alexander Henry Rhind in Luxor, reportedly found during illegal excavations at Thebes. After Rhind's death it was acquired by the British Museum, which later transferred it to the British Library. A fragment of the papyrus is held separately by the Brooklyn Museum. The papyrus was not excavated under controlled conditions, and its original archaeological context is unknown.

Remember this

Eighty-four worked problems, no general rules, and mistakes left in. Ancient mathematics was learned by example, not by proof.

Test yourself

The Rhind Papyrus uses almost exclusively unit fractions. Why does that system make some calculations harder, and why did the Egyptians not simply adopt a more flexible notation?

Go deeper

Image: MinnesotanUser, CC BY-SA 4.0. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0. Source.

← Back to day 23