Skip to content
The Daily Triptych063 / 365
Two figures wrapped in gold-patterned robes embrace at the edge of a flowered surface. The man bends over the woman, whose face tilts upward, eyes closed. His robe is geometric rectangles; hers is concentric circles.

3 details · select a number

Gustav Klimt, Public domain
Public domain

III · THE WORK · ART HISTORY

Klimt's The Kiss

Gustav Klimt · 1907 · Oil and gold leaf on canvas · Belvedere, Vienna

▶ Listen · narrated

A man's robe is a grid of gold rectangles. A woman's is a field of gold circles. Their faces are painted as if neither pattern exists.

At a glance

Artist
Gustav Klimt
Date
1907
Material
Oil paint, gold leaf, canvas
Dimensions
180 × 180 cm (square)
Collection
Belvedere, Vienna

Look closer

  1. The geometry of the robes

    His robe is a grid of black-edged rectangles filled with white, grey and gold. Hers is a field of concentric circles and ovals, some filled, some empty, scattered across a lighter ground. The division is absolute: masculine geometry versus feminine ornament, rectilinear versus curvilinear. Klimt has applied real gold leaf to both, so the surface catches light like a Byzantine icon. The gold is not illusionistic. It does not model form or suggest fabric. It sits on the canvas as a flat, reflective skin.

  2. The naturalism of the faces

    The man's face is turned away, visible only in profile. The woman's tilts upward, eyes closed, painted with the soft modelling and tonal gradation of nineteenth-century academic portraiture. Her hands are equally three-dimensional, fingers articulated, nails visible. Klimt has not flattened these elements into pattern. They remain volumetric, shadowed, convincingly fleshy. The clash between this illusionism and the abstract field surrounding it is the central tension of the picture. Two incompatible systems occupy the same canvas without resolving into a unified style.

  3. The flowered ledge

    The couple kneels at the edge of a surface covered in small, stylised flowers — white, blue, red — against a dark ground. It reads as a ledge or cliff, though Klimt gives no horizon or depth behind it. The flowers are flat shapes, closer to textile design than botanical illustration. Below the ledge, the canvas turns to a void of gold. The positioning suggests precariousness: the figures are at the edge of something, though whether it is symbolic or simply compositional remains unspecified.

The story

Klimt painted The Kiss in 1907, during what is now called his Golden Period, when he incorporated gold leaf and metallic pigments into a series of large allegorical and portrait works. The technique was not new to European painting — it had been standard in medieval panel painting and Byzantine mosaics — but it was archaic by early twentieth-century standards. Klimt was reaching backwards, past the naturalism that had dominated painting since the Renaissance, to recover a decorative flatness.

The painting was exhibited in 1908 under the title Liebespaar, "the lovers". It shows two figures, their bodies obscured by robes, embracing. The man bends over the woman, his hands cradling her face. She kneels, her face tilted upward, eyes closed. Their heads are crowned with vines or flowers. The composition is tightly cropped, the figures filling almost the entire square canvas, so that the embrace feels monumental rather than intimate.

The robes are the dominant visual element. His is a vertical grid of black-edged rectangles, filled with white, grey and gold. Hers is a cascade of concentric circles and ovals, some solid, some outlined, scattered across a lighter ground. Klimt has applied real gold leaf to both surfaces, so the picture reflects light like a reliquary. The gold does not behave as paint. It does not describe form or suggest the fall of fabric. It sits on the canvas as a separate material, flat and metallic.

Against this abstraction, the faces and hands are painted with conventional naturalism. The woman's face is modelled with soft tonal transitions, her eyelids and lips rendered with the same attention to volume and light that a nineteenth-century academic painter would have used. The man's hands, visible at her face and neck, are equally three-dimensional. Klimt has not flattened these elements into the decorative field. They remain stubbornly illusionistic, as if imported from a different painting.

The tension between the two systems is not resolved. The picture does not synthesise flatness and depth into a unified style. Instead, it holds them in opposition. The faces insist on being read as real, physical presences. The gold insists on being read as surface, as ornament, as a denial of depth. Both claims are made simultaneously, and neither is withdrawn.

The couple kneels at the edge of a surface covered in stylised flowers. Below them, the canvas turns to gold. The positioning suggests a ledge or cliff, though Klimt provides no horizon or spatial context. The effect is of figures suspended in a decorative void, neither fully in the world of represented space nor fully absorbed into pattern.

Why it mattered then

Klimt was a founding member of the Vienna Secession, a group of artists who broke from the conservative exhibition practices of Vienna's official art institutions in 1897. The Secession promoted a decorative, stylised approach to painting that rejected both academic naturalism and the narrative conventions of history painting. The Kiss belongs to this moment, when ornament was being reasserted as a legitimate concern for serious painting, not merely for applied arts. The use of gold leaf connected the picture to Vienna's Byzantine past — the mosaics of Ravenna, which Klimt had visited, and the gold-ground icons of the Orthodox tradition. It also connected it to the contemporary interest in craft and materials promoted by the Arts and Crafts movement and Art Nouveau. The painting was decorative in a way that late nineteenth-century academic painting was not, and the decoration was made from expensive, non-illusionistic materials. This was a claim about what painting could be: not a window onto a represented world, but an object with its own material presence.

Why it matters now

The Kiss remains one of the most reproduced images in the history of art, appearing on postcards, posters, mugs, and calendars with a frequency that has made it both ubiquitous and, for some viewers, invisible. The reproduction flattens the picture further, eliminating the reflective behaviour of the gold leaf and reducing the image to a pattern of shapes and colours. What remains is the embrace, the decorative robes, and the sense of romantic intensity. The painting's continuing appeal may lie precisely in the unresolved tension between abstraction and representation. The faces are specific enough to suggest real people, but not so specific that they become portraits. The embrace is intimate, but the figures are wrapped in geometry that distances them from everyday experience. The picture offers both emotional immediacy and decorative remove, and it does not require the viewer to choose between them. For painters, The Kiss remains an example of how incompatible pictorial systems can coexist in a single work without collapsing into incoherence. Klimt did not synthesise flatness and depth. He placed them side by side and let the clash stand. That refusal to resolve the picture into a unified style was radical in 1907, and it remains a viable strategy now.

The surprising detail

The painting is square — 180 centimetres (5 ft 11 in) on each side. This is an unusual format for a figurative painting, more common in decorative panels than in easel pictures. The square gives the composition a stability that a vertical rectangle would not have provided, and it reinforces the sense that the picture is as much an object, a decorated surface, as it is a representation of two people. The format itself is part of the argument the painting makes about flatness and ornament.

Remember this

The clash between the gold-leafed geometry and the naturalistically painted faces is not a problem Klimt failed to solve. It is the subject of the picture.

Test yourself

Why does the use of real gold leaf, rather than gold-coloured paint, change what the picture is doing?

Go deeper

Image: Gustav Klimt, Public domain. Licence: Public domain. Source.

← Back to day 63