Skip to content
The Daily Triptych223 / 365
A very small sheet of aged paper covered in quick brown pen lines: a seated woman bending over an infant who twists in her arms towards a cat. Faint scored lines and patches of brown wash lie under and around the inked drawing.
Leonardo da Vinci, Public domain
Public domain

I · THE OBJECT · BRITISH MUSEUM

Study for the Madonna of the Cat

Leonardo da Vinci · 15th century · Pen, ink and bistre on paper · British Museum

▶ Listen · narrated

Most Renaissance drawings were made to be looked at. This one, smaller than a postcard, was made to think with: Leonardo drew the same group on both sides of the sheet, reversed.

At a glance

Artist
Leonardo da Vinci
Date
15th century
Materials
Ink and bistre on paper
Dimensions
130 × 94 mm (3.7 in)
Registration number
1856,0621.1
Type
Drawing; part of a drawing series

Look closer

  1. The scale is the first surprise

    The sheet is 130 millimetres (5.12 in) high and 94 wide — smaller than a modern postcard, comfortably held in one hand. Nothing about the subject required that size; a Virgin and Child was, in fifteenth-century Italy, a subject painted at panel scale for churches and households. A sheet this small is a working size: something to hold close, turn over, and carry between rooms rather than pin up and admire from a distance.

  2. Two techniques, layered

    The drawings were made in pen and brown ink, and they sit on top of lines first laid in with a stylus — a hard point that leaves a shallow groove in the paper rather than a mark of colour. So there are two stages visible at once: a faint scored plan, and the inked drawing that follows or departs from it. The back of the sheet also carries a brown wash, ink diluted and brushed on to establish where the shadow falls, which the pen alone cannot do.

  3. The same group, reversed

    There is a drawing on each side of the paper, and the two are related by mirror symmetry: what leans left on one face leans right on the other. The relationship is not something you can see by looking at one side at a time. It becomes visible by transparency — with light behind the thin sheet, the design on the far side shows through and registers, reversed, against the design in front of you.

The story

The whole object is one piece of paper, 130 millimetres (5.12 in) high and 94 millimetres (3.7 in) wide — smaller than a modern postcard, small enough to disappear under a spread hand. It carries a drawing on the front and another on the back, both by Leonardo da Vinci. Each drawing was built in stages, and the stages are still visible. First came a sketch made with a stylus: a hard point that lays down no ink at all, only a shallow groove pressed into the paper. A stylus line is nearly visible only when light rakes across the surface, which makes it a good planning tool — it lets an artist place the figures without committing to anything a viewer would notice. Over that scored plan Leonardo drew in pen with brown ink, the layer that carries the picture. On the back he added a third layer: a brown wash, meaning ink thinned with water and brushed on in broad patches to show where shadow falls, something the pen's thin lines cannot do on their own.

The sheet now belongs to the British Museum in London, registered as 1856,0621.1 — the string of digits under which it appears in the museum's ledger. The catalogue lists it as both a drawing and a drawing series, which is the cataloguer's way of saying one sheet, more than one work. How the paper travelled from a fifteenth-century Italian workshop to a case in Bloomsbury, the sources used here do not say. That silence is normal. Drawings were working papers, not treasures, and any tidy ownership story attached to a famous name should be treated with suspicion until a document backs it.

The subject is the Virgin Mary with the infant Christ, and a cat. Leonardo kept returning to that combination: six of his surviving works show the Virgin and Child playing with a cat or carrying one. The cat is the engine of the design. A mother and child on their own settle naturally into a stable pyramid, one body enclosing the other, and painters had arranged them that way for centuries. A cat refuses to hold a pose. Put one in the child's reach and the child twists towards it, the mother bends to steady them both, and the weight of the whole group slides off centre. The tidy pyramid comes apart. What these drawings record is Leonardo trying, more than once, to make that squirming three-body tangle read as a single coherent shape.

The most revealing thing about the sheet is not either drawing alone but the relationship between them. They are mirror images: what leans left on one face leans right on the other. You cannot see this by turning the paper over, because turning it flips your view as well. It shows only by transparency. The paper is thin, and with a light behind it the drawing on the far side shines through and lines up, reversed, against the drawing facing you. The simplest reading of the physical evidence is that Leonardo used this see-through property as a tool. He drew the group on one side, turned the sheet over, saw the first drawing showing faintly through the paper, and drew the group again by following those lines — which handed him the same composition flipped left to right, without measuring or copying anything. Why go to the trouble? Because reversing a design is a test. A group of figures that feels balanced read one way can feel lopsided the other, and the eye cannot run that test in imagination; it has to see the reversal. The paper's thinness made the test cheap: turn, hold to the light, look.

That account of his method needs a caution attached. It is worked out from the object — from the grooves, the layers, the mirror match — not from anything Leonardo wrote or anyone recorded. The creative and technical processes behind the sheet have been discussed by a long line of art historians, including Kenneth Clark, Martin Kemp, Carmen Bambach and Larry Feinberg, and the discussion has not closed. When generations of specialists keep arguing about one postcard-sized page, that is a fair sign the page does not explain itself.

Other gaps stay open too. The date is recorded only as the 15th century: no year, no city, no patron. The sources cited here name no finished painting by Leonardo of the Virgin and Child with a cat, so it would be wrong to call the sheet preparation for a specific surviving picture. It is a study for an idea — one Leonardo tried across at least six surviving works — and whether the idea ever reached a painted panel, these sources do not say. What survives is the thinking itself, laid down in brown ink on both faces of one small leaf.

Why it mattered then

In the 15th century, paper was becoming cheap enough to waste, and that change reshaped how artists worked. When the surface you draw on is costly, you commit to a design before you start. When it is cheap, you can try a group of figures, judge it, turn the sheet over and try again — which is what happened here. This sheet belongs to the cheap-paper world: a small, private, working object, never meant to impress a patron. The Virgin and Child was among the most commissioned subjects in Italian art, and every workshop could supply one. Because the subject was fixed, invention had to happen elsewhere: in the arrangement — how the two bodies fit together, where the weight rests, what the child reaches for. Adding a cat made the problem harder on purpose, because a live animal pulls the composition off centre. Six of Leonardo's works take up the same idea, which suggests the difficulty was the attraction, not an accident. This sheet shows what Renaissance problem-solving looked like at close range: not the grand subject, but the mechanics of three bodies in a small space.

Why it matters now

A finished painting tells you what an artist decided. A working drawing tells you there was a decision to make — and this sheet shows that unusually plainly, because the alternative version is physically present on the other side of the paper. The mirror relationship between the two faces turns an abstract idea, an artist testing a design against its own reflection, into something you can point to on a single object. The sheet also poses a problem museums face constantly and rarely solve: a double-sided drawing cannot be fully shown. Frame it, and one drawing faces the wall. The see-through effect needs light behind the paper, which no visitor standing in front of a glass case can have. Whatever you see on display, or in a photograph, is at best half the object. That corrects a common assumption — that standing in front of a thing tells you everything about it. The honest gaps deserve attention too. A date of the 15th century with no year. No identified finished painting. A working method reconstructed from the paper itself rather than from any record. Most Renaissance drawings are like this. The famous name on the label does not close the questions.

The surprising detail

The most informative feature of this sheet is invisible when it lies flat on a table. The two drawings are mirror images of each other, and the match shows only when light passes through the paper: the drawing on the far side then appears through the sheet and lines up, reversed, with the one in front. So the key evidence for how Leonardo worked here sits not in the ink but in the paper's thinness. He could draw the group, turn the sheet over, and follow what showed through — seeing at once how his design read when flipped left to right.

What is disputed

Three things are genuinely open. The date is recorded only as the fifteenth century, with no year. The sources supplied name no finished painting of this composition, so the sheet is best described as a study for an idea rather than for a known picture. And the sequence of work — which face was drawn first, and exactly how the reversed version was arrived at — is an inference from the object, not a documented account; the creative and technical processes behind these drawings have been discussed by Kenneth Clark, Martin Kemp, Carmen Bambach, Larry Feinberg and others without producing a single settled explanation.

How it got here

The sheet is in the British Museum, catalogued as 1856,0621.1. How it travelled from Leonardo's hands to Bloomsbury — the collectors, sales and gifts in between — is not established by the sources cited here, and the tidy acquisition narrative that usually accompanies a famous name should not be supplied from imagination. The museum's own collection record is the place where that history, where it is known, would be set out.

Remember this

One small sheet, drawn on both sides, the two designs mirroring each other through the paper: Leonardo testing a composition in reverse, not presenting a finished one.

Test yourself

Why does the mirror relationship between the two sides of this sheet tell us more about Leonardo's working method than either drawing would on its own?

Go deeper

Image: Leonardo da Vinci, Public domain. Licence: Public domain. Source.

← Back to day 223