I · THE OBJECT · BRITISH MUSEUM

The Tomb-Chapel Paintings of Nebamun

New Kingdom Egypt · c. 1350 BC (Eighteenth Dynasty) · Paint on plastered mud-brick

▶ Listen · narrated

Egyptian tomb paintings were not memorials. They were machines for generating pleasure in the afterlife, and this wall was designed to work for eternity.

At a glance

Date: c. 1350 BC, Eighteenth Dynasty
Discovery: 1820s, Theban Necropolis
Original location: Tomb-chapel, west bank of the Nile at Thebes
Current location: British Museum

Look closer

The cat is catching three birds simultaneously
Look at the ginger cat clinging to two papyrus stems in the lower right. It holds one bird in its front paws, a second in its mouth, and has pinned a third beneath its hind legs. This is not natural history. It is visual abundance made literal: the marsh is so thick with game that even the household cat succeeds impossibly. The cat's eyes were inlaid with gold leaf, now mostly lost. They would have caught the lamplight when visitors came to feast in the chapel.
Nebamun's pose is frozen mid-throw
Nebamun stands in a small papyrus skiff, right arm cocked back holding a throwing stick, left hand gripping three live herons by their legs as decoys. His weight is on his back foot. The pose captures the instant before release, an action that will never complete. In the tomb, this was not frustration but perfection: the hunt perpetually ready, the outcome guaranteed by the birds already falling around him. Time in the afterlife did not progress. It renewed.
The hieroglyphs are damaged where his name and titles stood
The columns of hieroglyphs above and beside Nebamun are incomplete. His full titles are lost. We know he was a scribe and grain accountant because fragments survive, but the careful demolition of his name in antiquity—probably during a tomb robbery—means we do not know his full identity. The paintings survived because they were cut from the chapel walls in large sections. The tomb itself has never been relocated since the 1820s.

The story

The scene shows Nebamun fowling in the marshes, but it is not a memory of a day out. It is a promise.

He stands in a lightweight papyrus boat, the kind that flexed with the current and sat shallow enough to pole through reed beds. His wife Hatshepsut sits behind him, fully dressed in a long white gown and a heavy wig dressed with a perfume cone. Their daughter crouches at his feet, also in formal dress, holding a bunch of lotus flowers. No one is dressed for wading through mud. This is not a documentary image.

The papyrus thicket around them seethes with life. Birds fly up in alarm, their wings caught mid-beat. A striped cat—probably a domestic animal, not a wild one—has scrambled up the stems and is performing an impossible feat, catching three birds at once. Butterflies and dragonflies fill the upper register. Tilapia and barbel swim in the water below, painted in profile as if the river were glass. The marsh represents *sekhet-iaru*, the Field of Reeds, the Egyptian paradise where the justified dead lived in perpetual plenty.

The throwing stick in Nebamun's hand is a *khepesh*, a curved wooden weapon used for hunting waterfowl. He holds it at the moment of greatest potential: cocked back, ready to release, the outcome certain but not yet expended. The three herons in his other hand are decoys. Live herons, tethered and held aloft, would attract other birds within range. The detail is accurate to actual hunting practice, but the meaning here is symbolic. Nebamun is shown as effective, skilled, and perpetually on the edge of success.

This wall was one of several in Nebamun's tomb-chapel, a room separate from the burial chamber where his family and colleagues would gather on festival days to leave food offerings and speak his name. Speaking the name of the dead was thought to sustain them. The paintings were not sealed away with the mummy. They were on display, visible by lamplight, activated by the presence of the living.

The chapel was built of mud-brick and plastered, then painted in mineral pigments: red and yellow ochre, green malachite, blue azurite, black carbon. The artists worked to a grid, sketching the composition in red ochre before painting. Corrections are visible in some fragments. The style is consistent with royal tomb painting of the period, suggesting Nebamun employed skilled workers, possibly from the workshops at Deir el-Medina where the royal tomb artists lived.

The tomb itself has been lost since the early nineteenth century. When it was discovered, probably in the 1820s, the location was not recorded—a common practice among excavators and dealers working in a competitive and legally ambiguous environment. The paintings were cut from the walls in sections and removed. Scientific analysis in 2008–09 suggested the tomb lies somewhere near Dra' Abu el-Naga', but it has not been relocated.

Why it mattered then

The tomb-chapel was not a place of mourning. It was a working building, visited regularly by the living, and the paintings were functional. On festival days—particularly the Beautiful Feast of the Valley, when Thebans crossed the river to picnic at the tombs of their relatives—Nebamun's family would have gathered in the chapel. They brought bread, beer, meat, and flowers. They poured water and burned incense. They spoke his name aloud. All of this sustained him in the afterlife. The paintings reinforced what the rituals promised: that Nebamun continued to exist, that he was effective and successful, that he enjoyed the pleasures he had known in life. The marshes were a dense symbolic landscape. They were the place where creation began, where the first land emerged from the waters of chaos. They were where Isis hid her son Horus from his enemies, raising him in secret among the papyrus. They were the boundary between the ordered world and the wild. To hunt there was to impose order on chaos, to demonstrate control and skill, to align oneself with the gods who did the same. The presence of his wife and daughter was also deliberate. Egyptian tomb imagery often showed the family intact, not as mourners but as participants in eternal life. The daughter holds lotus flowers, symbols of rebirth, which opened at dawn and closed at dusk. The wife's perfume cone—a lump of scented fat worn on top of the wig, which would melt slowly and release fragrance—was a luxury item, marking status and leisure. Nebamun was a scribe, a grain accountant, probably attached to a temple estate. He was not royal, but he was literate and held administrative authority, which in Egypt meant he was among the privileged minority. The tomb-chapel was expensive. It announced that he had succeeded in life and expected to succeed in death.

Why it matters now

The fragments survive because they were cut out and removed, but that removal is also why the tomb is lost. The location was not recorded, and the destruction of the chapel means it cannot now be reconstructed in situ. What remains is a painted surface of extraordinary preservation. The pigments are still vivid because they were sealed inside a tomb for three millennia, protected from sunlight and moisture. When we look at the ochre and malachite, we are seeing the colours as they appeared when the paint dried. The gold leaf on the cat's eyes, mostly lost now, would have glittered in lamplight. The paintings also preserve a level of detail that collapses the distance between us and the people who made them. The butterflies are identifiable to species. The fish are anatomically accurate. The plants are real marsh plants, not decorative motifs. The artists were observing the world closely, even as they arranged it into symbolic order. The broader question the fragments raise is what a tomb was for. In the modern West, graves are usually private and permanent, visited rarely if at all after the funeral. The Egyptian tomb-chapel was public, active, and required maintenance. The dead depended on the living. The paintings were not hidden treasures. They were working images, meant to be seen and to function in the presence of an audience. That changes how we read them. The frozen moment of the hunt, the impossible cat, the formal dress in the marshes—these are not mistakes or fantasies. They are a carefully constructed eternity, designed to loop without wearing out. The wall was a machine for generating pleasure, and it was meant to run forever.

The surprising detail

The tomb-chapel was lost almost immediately after it was discovered. The location was kept secret, probably to prevent other excavators or dealers from accessing the site, and then the knowledge was never passed on. By the mid-nineteenth century, no one could say where it had been. Scientific analysis in 2008–09, using strontium isotope ratios in the plaster and geological mapping of the Theban Necropolis, narrowed the location to the area around Dra' Abu el-Naga', but the tomb itself has not been found. It is possible that it was destroyed in antiquity or buried by later construction. It is also possible that it still exists, unrecognised, somewhere in the necropolis.

What is disputed

The tomb has never been relocated since its discovery in the 1820s. The circumstances of the discovery are not well documented, and the identity of the excavator or dealer who removed the paintings is uncertain. Scientific analysis in 2008–09 suggested the tomb is located near Dra' Abu el-Naga', but this remains unconfirmed.

How it got here

The paintings were removed from the tomb-chapel walls in the 1820s, during a period when excavation and antiquities dealing in Egypt operated with minimal legal oversight. They were acquired by the British Museum in the nineteenth century. Egypt has not formally requested their return, but the removal and export occurred before modern archaeological and heritage protection standards, and the destruction of the chapel to extract the paintings means the original context cannot be studied. The loss of the tomb's location is a direct result of the secrecy surrounding early nineteenth-century excavation practices.

Remember this

Tomb paintings were not sealed away with the dead. They were working images in a room the living visited, designed to sustain the deceased forever.

Test yourself

Why is Nebamun shown at the moment before he releases the throwing stick, rather than at the moment of impact or after a successful strike?

Go deeper

Image: anonymous, Public domain. Licence: Public domain. Source.

← Back to day 30